CONTROLLED COMPARISON
What changed—and what did not.
This review version is intentionally limited to forms and the links required to find them.
Forms were reached mainly from individual pages and several were near the page end.
A visible “Find your form” navigation link and one 16-route directory.
Detailed registration language and 15–25 minute expectation.
A calm three-stage introduction with a credible three-minute first step.
Five to seven stages with extensive due-diligence questions before relevance was established.
Five identity fields, two relevance prompts, then useful optional context. Detailed diligence follows after review.
Some participant groups shared broad forms and had to interpret which questions applied.
Sixteen preselected routes with a distinct value statement and qualifying prompt.
Supporting files could be requested during the first submission.
No upload required initially; an optional evidence link is sufficient.
The form primarily explained EOI’s assessment requirements.
Time, purpose, privacy, no-guarantee and no-commitment expectations are visible before submission.
Visitors could lose the correct route while moving between pages.
Every form links back to the complete routes directory; footer and primary navigation also reach it.
Approved 11-scene storyline and images.
Unchanged.
Approved content and visual structure.
Unchanged except form entry links needed to reach the correct route.
REVIEW THE RESULT